That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
<span>What is the most powerful act of political participation?
A. voting
</span>
1. <span>The </span>Braddock<span> expedition, also called </span>Braddock's<span>campaign or, more commonly, </span>Braddock's<span> Defeat, was a failed British military expedition which attempted to capture the French Fort Duquesne (modern-day downtown Pittsburgh) in the summer of 1755 during the French and Indian War.
2. Braddock
3. the european
4. they took over the country
5. because alot of them were captured
6.they got captured
7. 1757
5 and 6 are switched</span>
The correct answer is self-concept.
Self concept is known to be recognizable from being mindful of one's self, which alludes to the degree to which self-information is characterized, predictable, and at present appropriate to one's demeanors and miens. Self-concepts likewise contrasts from self-esteem or also known as confidence: self-concept is an intellectual or spellbinding part of one's self, while confidence (self-esteem) is evaluative and stubborn
Answer:
I cant understand what language is that?
