The correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Explanation
Direct democracy is a form of government in which all members of a community/country/state actively participate in all decisions made there. On the other hand, there is indirect democracy, the evolution of direct democracy, in it, the decisions depend on a group of representatives elected by citizens, this modality of democracy has been adopted in most modern states.
Direct democracy has advantages over indirect democracy because it better responds to the interests of citizens as each of them will actively participate in the government, thus allowing decisions to be made and ensuring that their interests are taken into account. On the other hand, in indirect democracy, once you elect your representative, you have no direct control over the decisions he makes, regardless of whether they go against your interests. Therefore, the correct answer is A. It can be more responsive to the interests of citizens.
Answer:
The slave family was another important thing of black culture in the South.
Explanation:
Answer:
Maharana Pratap was a brave and patriotic Rajput with love for his motherland. He was an egoistic but responsible person. He Could have finished him self instead of going into exile but for the sake of his family's responsibility he struggles and survives.
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Organizing Roman history into 3 main eras
Explanation:
Periodization in history refers to the process of studying and categorizing events of the past in to block of time. This process is aimed at facilitating the analysis of historical events and understanding the causes of specific historical processes. Additionally, periodization is useful as blocks of time are organized according to relatively common characteristics. Considering periodization is applied when categorizing or organizing events of the past, it can be applied to Roman history which result could be 3 main eras with common historical features. Thus, periodization is useful in the case of organizing Roman History.
They can be harmful because these communications can be between large money donors and the candidates, which can lead to a conflict of interest and affect the candidates message.
