1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa05 [86]
2 years ago
15

After the French and Indian War, were the colonist allowed to enjoy the rewards

History
1 answer:
pishuonlain [190]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Great Britain had made a treaty that stated that all settlers were not to settle past the appellation (the mountain range near the east coast) line.

You might be interested in
What effect did the native americans use of surprise attacks have on the seminole wars?
Nuetrik [128]
It made sure to be a "surprise attack". Led by <span>Osceola, </span>Seminoles used the technique.<span> O</span>f course it would be affective since the other party would have little to no preparations for fighting.
8 0
3 years ago
If you wanted to be a fisherman, would you move to the desert in Arizona? Why or why not?
lidiya [134]
I would not because it seems dry down there
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who assisted James Monroe in the writing of the Monroe doctrine?
netineya [11]

Two things had been uppermost in the minds of Adams and Monroe. In 1821 the Russian czar had proclaimed that all the area north of the fifty-first parallel and extending one hundred miles into the Pacific would be off-limits to non-Russians. Adams had refused to accept this claim, and he told the Russian minister that the United States would defend the principle that the ‘American continents are no longer subjects of any new European colonial establishments.’

More worrisome, however, was the situation in Central and South America. Revolutions against Spanish rule had been under way for some time, but it seemed possible that Spain and France might seek to reassert European rule in those regions. The British, meanwhile, were interested in ensuring the demise of Spanish colonialism, with all the trade restrictions that Spanish rule involved. British foreign secretary George Canning formally proposed, therefore, that London and Washington unite on a joint warning against intervention in Latin America. When the Monroe cabinet debated the idea, Adams opposed it, arguing that British interests dictated such a policy in any event, and that Canning’s proposal also called upon the two powers to renounce any intention of annexing such areas as Cuba and Texas. Why should the United States, he asked, appear as a cockboat trailing in the wake of a British man-of-war?

In the decades following Monroe’s announcement, American policymakers did not invoke the doctrine against European powers despite their occasional military ‘interventions’ in Latin America. Monroe’s principal concern had been to make sure that European mercantilism not be reimposed on an area of increasing importance economically and ideologically to the United States. When, however, President John Tyler used the doctrine in 1842 to justify seizing Texas, a Venezuelan newspaper responded with what would become an increasingly bitter theme throughout Latin America: ‘Beware, brothers, the wolf approaches the lambs.’

Secretary of State William H. Seward attempted a bizarre use of the doctrine in 1861 in hopes of avoiding the Civil War. The United States, said Seward, in order to divert attention from the impending crisis, should challenge supposed European interventions in the Western Hemisphere by launching a drive to liberate Cuba and end the last vestiges of colonialism in the Americas. President Lincoln turned down the idea.

In the 1890s, the United States, once again by unilateral action, extended the doctrine to include the right to decide how a dispute between Venezuela and Great Britain over the boundaries of British Guiana should be settled. Secretary of State Richard Olney told the British, ‘Today the United States is practically sovereign on this continent and its fiat is law upon the subjects to which it confines its interposition…. its infinite resources combined with its isolated position render it master of the situation and practically invulnerable as against any or all other powers.’ The British, troubled by the rise of Germany and Japan, could only acquiesce in American pretensions. But Latin American nations protested the way in which Washington had chosen to ‘defend’ Venezuelan interests.

4 0
3 years ago
In poetry meter is the pattern of ​
AfilCa [17]

Basic rhythmic structure of a verse or lines in verse.

6 1
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which describes a consequence of the Viking raids into other European countries?
Lisa [10]

The Vikings’ mythology, craftsmanship, literature, and seafaring skills became a part of the European inheritance.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The supreme court's ruling prohibiting further recounting of florida's votes and awarding the 2000 election to george w. bush wa
    14·1 answer
  • Have the overall effects of globalization been more positive or negative?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following qualifies as genocide?
    15·1 answer
  • How did population growth in the eventually rebellious colonies compare with Englands?
    12·1 answer
  • In Ghana what two groups helped the king govern?How?
    14·1 answer
  • This Portuguese explorer discovered Brazil
    11·2 answers
  • What does the Sepoy Rebellion reveal about the difficulties in practicing<br> imperialism?
    12·1 answer
  • What 3 ideas were taught by Martin Luther king
    13·1 answer
  • How did the boston port act affect the colonists?
    12·2 answers
  • Based on this map, how do you think the Black Death spread through Asia?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!