That would be known as executive power.
Hope this helps!
MidnightQueen
Answer:
The answer would be C.
Explanation:
A. wouldn't do anything for Mexico, it would just make more Mexican citizens flea from Mexico.
B. wouldn't work at all because a wall has been proven not to stop anyone.
D. wouldn't work either. Mexico enforcing or not enforcing anti-drug laws has been proven not to change anything. In fact, to compare this so that it makes more sense, guns are completely illegal in Mexico, and Mexican Citizens and Cartels still have so many firearms that are usually illegal in the United States. So what would happen if they even tried to change anything about enforcing fewer or more anti-drug laws?
<u>Main point is that education opportunities in Mexico would make a huge change, especially if it was more politic related because then it would cause another type of revolution to occur, resulting in people wanting to fight for a good cause and a better future for Mexico.</u>
The auditor generally identifies and assesses RMMs "at the financial statement and relevant assertion levels."
This is because the main reason for carrying out the risk assessment is to create a defining motive for designing and performing further audit procedures.
Thus, at the financial statement and relevant assertion levels, the auditor would have known that the information being used was accurate.
This is because the financial statement and relevant assertions are considered as management's statements that the financial statements used are accurate.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "at the financial statement and relevant assertion levels."
Answer:
For 1. educator and reformer, first president and principal developer of Tuskegee Normal
2.Washington and his fellow patriots fought the American Revolution for ... The 225-man regiment eventually included 140 black soldiers,
Explanation:
