Answer: Product excellence
Explanation: In simple words, product excellence refers to providing the right product in the market so that the satisfaction of customer could be maximized. This could be achieved when the organisation have a clear insight of customers needs and preference.
Making customers happy will always result in the competitive advantage for the firm and product excellence is the way of doing so.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Based on that attachment given, we should note that the following was gotten as:
1. Inventory in process beginning:
This was gotten as:
= 2,400 × 65%
= 2400 × 0.65
= 1,560
Started and completed:
= 10,800 - 2,400
= 8,400
Inventory in process ending
= 1,900 × 60%
= 1900 × 0.6
= 1,140
Answer:
D. Krispy Kreme and Dunkin' Donuts will both choose a price of $0.85.
Explanation:
DD - Dunkin' Donuts
KK - Krispy Kreme
If DD choose price to be $1.25, KK will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $975 among $850 / $975
If DD choose price to be $0.85, KK will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $650 among $250 / $650
Thus, KK have a dominant strategy to choose price = $0.85 no matter what DD choose.
If KK choose price to be $1.25, DD will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $975 among $850 / $975
If KK choose price to be $0.85, DD will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $650 among $250 / $650
Thus, DD have a dominant strategy to choose price = $0.85 no matter what KK choose.
Both firms have a dominant strategy of choosing price = $0.85 which creates a Nash equilibrium.
Answer:
The correct answer is that: informants are difficult to control and the police can not trust in them always.
Explanation:
To begin with, if the police officer finds out that the informant went behind his back and purchase drug then the officer must understand that the informant is not trustful and moreover<u> he could mean a risk to the whole undercover operation</u> that the police officer is managing, therefore that the scenario is propounding that situations like that exemplify that informants can not be trusted due to the fact that they are ex convicted and that is why the officers have to be carefull when working with them.
The part that has to do with analytical listening is, she has asked questions to clarify what he says.
<h3>What is analytical listening?</h3>
This is the type of listening that is done in such a way that what is being said would be properly analyzed.
This is not just about understanding what is being said. It has to do with division of questions to get to the main points.
Read more on analytical listening here:
brainly.com/question/20841873
#SPJ1
