D. Worcester v. Georgia - <span>was a case in which the United States Supreme Court choose the conviction of Samuel </span>Worcester<span> and held that the </span>Georgia<span> criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
a dries up liqwids and fats
Explanation:
Answer:
Africans were forced into brutal labor by Belgian rulers to collect rubber, leading to millions of deaths
Explanation:
Under the rule of Belgium, with King Leopold II as its head, the Congo Free State, roughly on the territory of modern day DR Congo, had suffered immensely. Initially, the colony was not barely sustainable, always being on the verge of bankruptcy, but that all changed with the sudden big demand fro rubber. The Congo Basin had loads of it, and the Belgians intended to use that to make profit. The native population was quickly mobilized and was forced to brutal labor force, being constantly tortured, mutilated, beaten up, given only so much food so that they can barely survive to work the next day. This, combined with other factors, led to lot of deaths, the numbers vary anywhere from one to fifteen million deaths. Understandably, the native people rebelled against this, and it turned out to be a long and bloody conflict, where the end result was just more deaths.
The reason is probably that they did not want the president to have all power like a king did they wanted to stay way from anything like a king
The process of checks and balances which <em>make it more likely</em> that a judge, once appointed, will rule impartially is:
- It ensures that there is more than one person, more than one view so any ruling in the future would not be biased to that one view.
<h3>Checks and Balances</h3>
This is the principle that states that the three arms of government, the <em>Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary</em> all have separated powers and <em>checks on the activities</em> of each other so that there would not be tyranny.
<h3>How this helps</h3>
This helps in the appointment of a federal judge as though the President, who is part of the Executive makes a list of federal judges to appoint, it is up to the Congress, part of the Legislature to either <em>accept or reject </em>this nomination and this ensures that the federal judge is <em>not loyal to the president </em>and neglects his duties,
Read more about checks and balances here:
brainly.com/question/8927972
