There is no specific question here. It is just a statement.
If this a true or false question, then the answer will be "true."
The above text refers to moments during the Atlantic Slave Trade.
This inhuman slave trade brought terrible consequences to the African tribes such as the poverty and hunger in their societies. This Atlantic Slave trade made countries to develop economies based on slavery and the exploitation of raw materials. It also destroyed the culture and tradition of the tribes, split families, increased warfare, supported dictators as rulers, and developed colonization throughout the African territory.
Both struggled with starvation with starvation and other harsh conditions. The Jamestown colony disappeared, but the Plymouth colony thrived after the help of the Native Americans.
Answer:
President Bush surely based his decision on previous jurisprudence by the Supreme Court. In 1899, the Court was asked to make an interpretation of the religion clause of the First Amendment. It was a case involving federal financing through a grant for the construction of a hospital that was going to be run by a Catholic order. The Court saw the hospital as a secular institution and charted as such by Congress, not a religious one, and in this way it avoided the constitutional issue.
Though uphelding the strict lay character of the state, the Court has not closed the door to all types of aid for certain activities by religious organizations.
Explanation:
Answer:
A democracy by true definition is the right for the people to govern themselves. This is split into two versions, one called <em>direct democracy</em>, and the other called <em>indirect democracy</em>.
In Direct Democracy, each person's opinions are counted, and everybody votes directly for the laws established by the government. The majority would then rule. Examples of this can be found in Athens of Ancient Greece, in between times of upheaval.
In Indirect Democracy, each person votes for a representative of their ideals, and if elected, the official would then try to push for legislations and laws that reflect those believed by either his/herself as well as the voters who voted for them.
Now to the question. The First Amendment states that: "Congress shall make no law.... prohibiting free exercise... or abridging the freedom of speech... or the right of the people... to assemble... and [allowing the people] to petition the Government [to address problems]."
As you can tell from the quote, the 1st Amendment allows the individuals to have a certain amount of rights. Starting from the smallest, is the right to exercise free speech. Each person is allowed to say what they want, though there will be consequences to what you say. The second part is to allow people of like mind and beliefs to assemble in an orderly fashion, without the government interfering. The last part is allowing the citizens to directly petition the government for changes.
Democracy is all about a person's beliefs and opinions to be heard, and for their voice to be reflected in the government. Without the First Amendment, suppression would take place. The beliefs of some would be put down and may come under flak and even oppression is voiced. This can be seen in many Middle East countries (barring Israel and Egypt to a certain extent). The protection of the First Amendment is necessary to protect a person's right to say what they want, and to take action in doing what they want to do. Without this ability, all of their rights will be in jeopardy and there will be no democracy.
