Historically speaking, <span>bilateral relations between the United States and the various countries of Latin America</span><span> have been multifaceted and complex, at times defined by strong regional cooperation and at others filled with economic and political tension and rivalry. Although relations between the U.S. government and most of Latin America were limited prior to the late 1800s, for most of the past century, the U.S. has unofficially regarded parts of Latin America as within </span>its sphere of influence<span>, and for much of the </span>Cold War<span> (1947-1989), actively vied with the </span>Soviet Union<span> for influence in the Western Hemisphere.</span>
Answer:
Plan better campaigns if they know what is important to the public.
Explanation:
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that these two philosophies were completely at odds with one another, since the Enlightenment thinkers were strongly against absolute monarchies, while Filmer was supportive of them. </span></span>
Answer:
In the nineteenth century, the United States sent troops into Latin America and South America.
Explanation:
After the Monroe Doctrine, there was a growing political thought in the United States that viewed South American countries as their 'Backyard'
Mexico, Brazil and even newly Independent countries of the time such as Chile and Venezuela were seen as improvised and underdeveloped.
The US political elites held racist views for these countries and assumed that they were poor simply because of an inferior race.
For the next 100 years, the United States would be heavily involved in these countries, either by going directly to war, supporting local rebels or even dictators.
