A US district court ruled earlier this week that North Carolina’s partisan gerrymandered congressional districts were unconstitutional, raising the very real possibility that new maps might need to be drawn mere weeks before the 2018 House elections.
New districts would likely be a boon for Democrats: Though North Carolina is evenly or nearly evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans, Republicans currently hold 10 of the state’s 13 House seats. In their quest for a House majority, even one or two newly competitive seats in North Carolina would be a major boost to Democrats’ chances of taking over at least one chamber of Congress.
But first, state officials and the courts need to figure out if drawing new districts is even possible in such a short time and whether the congressional elections might need to be delayed in order to accommodate the court-ordered redistricting. Looming over all of it is the US Supreme Court, which could put a stay on the lower court’s decision and bring the whole mad dash to an end very quickly.
North Carolina Republican leaders accused the federal court’s decision of introducing “unmitigated chaos” to the state’s 2018 elections — and while they are surely peeved at the thought of losing congressional seats, they aren’t wrong in thinking the court has upended the 2018 landscape in North Carolina and nationwide.
hope i helped!!
True because it would lead United states into wars with countries they may not have planned to be at war with and there will be more united states citizens that our country man not be able to control.
Answer:
Socrates's approach to seeking knowledge, and some of his fellow Athenians find it controversial is described below in detail.
Explanation:
Socrates evolved the dialectical method for obtaining knowledge. He practiced an inductive approach to argumentation to generate universal explanations. This was his approach to the certainty that would be developed by Plato. Socrates highlighted knowledge all his life because he considered that “the intelligence to differentiate between right and wrong rests in people's understanding, not in society.”
Answer:
History books portray him as a brutal emperor who massacred millions of Asian and Eastern European people. However, he also practiced religious and racial tolerance, and his Mongolian Empire valued the leadership of women. Khan also brought law and civilization to Mongolia and is regarded as a hero in his native land. So technically he is neither a villain or a hero.
The Libertarian party is highly against government interventionism and believes that wars should be fought only and only if attacked first, as self defense.
