1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gekata [30.6K]
2 years ago
13

The seller agrees to pay the listing real estate agent a commission of 5%. The property is listed at $400,000, the buyer offers

and seller agrees on price of $380,000 and it closes at that price. The buyer obtains a loan of $300,000. The property is tax assessed at $350,000. The commission most likely paid to the real estate agent is:__________
A. No commission is owed because it did not sell at the list price
B. $17,500
C. $20,000
D. $19,000
Business
1 answer:
Viktor [21]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C. $20,000

Explanation:

Note that we are talking about the listing commission. Listing commission will be calculated on the listed price.

So, the listed price will be = 400,000 * 5%

= $20,000

Thus, the commission most likely paid to the real estate agent is $20,000

You might be interested in
In a few sentences, explain how a credit score affects creditworthiness and the cost of credit.
Anastasy [175]
A credit score is the number that is assigned to the lenders that measure how well they are able to pay a debt. Credit scores are affected by how the previous loans were paid as well the amount of the loan. Late payments, short term loans, and small loans will result to a low credit score.
3 0
3 years ago
Using the logic of the two-sided search model, compare the impact on the economy of government spending on education and apprent
Inga [223]

Answer:

Recent changes in American public assistance programs have emphasized the role of work. Employer subsidies such as the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and the Welfare-to-Work Tax Credit (WtW) are designed to encourage employment by reimbursing employers for a portion of wages paid to certain welfare and food stamp recipients, among other groups. a simple dynamic search model of employment subsidies was developed and then test the model’s implications for the

employment outcomes of WOTC- and WtW-subsidized workers. The model predicts that subsidized workers will have higher rates of employment and higher wages than equally productive unsubsidized workers, and it highlights some possible effects of the subsidy on job tenure. predictions was tested using a unique administrative data set from the state of Wisconsin. These data provide information on demographic characteristics, employment histories, and WOTC and WtW participation for all welfare and food stamp recipients in the state for the years 1998 -2001. from those of eligibility.

The employment, wage, and job tenure effects of the WOTC and WtW using propensity score was estimated.

The estimation the effects of the Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC) and the Welfare to Work Tax Credit (WtW) on employment outcomes of disadvantaged workers. These credits offer

subsidies to firms that hire individuals who may otherwise have difficulty finding jobs, such as certain welfare recipients, disadvantaged youth, and disabled individuals. Past work on previous employer-based credits found weak or even nonexistent employment effects, which resulted in the elimination of these

subsidies. The WOTC has been reauthorized four times since its implementation in 1996, and the WtW three times since its implementation in 1998, yet no study has carefully examined their effectiveness.

An analytical model of the WOTC and WtW were developed that allows workers from the same population to be paid different wages based on their value to the particular firms in which they are

employed. I also incorporate a binding minimum wage, which results in some long-term unemployment.

Finally, wages and employment status to change over time as employers learn about workers’ productivity in their firm. This dynamic element is essential to the model, since predictions about wage trajectories and job tenure cannot be made based on a static model. For example, concerns that

disadvantaged workers will end up in short-term, low-paying jobs cannot be addressed analytically without a model that allows changes in employment status over time. This gradual learning treats job matches as “experience goods” whose value cannot be determined ex ante.

Flinn (2003) introduces a minimum wage and investigates its effects on labor market outcomes and welfare in a search framework. Flinn incorporates the possibility of wage bargaining, and analyzes the effects of the minimum wage under different levels of worker bargaining power. Adding bargaining power to the model allows him to relax Jovanovic’s assumption that workers are always paid their (expected) marginal products; this is an important consideration if firms in certain markets are able to extract some rents from workers and pay wages closer to the reservation wage.

However, Flinn’s mode assumes that there is no uncertainty about productivity, even at the time of hire. In the context of the low wage labor market, in which employers might perceive some risks of hiring inexperienced workers, this assumption is restrictive. I therefore develop a model that maintains the bargaining and minimum wage

aspects of Flinn’s model but incorporates a simple form of uncertainty based on Jovanovic (1979), allowing job matches to be characterized as experience goods. This hybrid model is extended to include wage subsidies for a particular subset of workers.

7 0
3 years ago
...<br><br><br><br><br>Great <br><br>-----------------
Vilka [71]

Answer:

Thanks for the points.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Choose the correct statement.
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

D. The outlet substitution bias injects an upward bias into the CPI

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Balerio Corporation's relevant range of activity is 9,000 units to 14,000 units. When it produces and sells 11,000 units, its av
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

$302,500

Explanation:

The computation of total amount of product costs is shown below:-

Product cost for 11,000 units = Direct material + Direct labor + Manufacturing overhead cost incurred

= ($7.30 + $3.90 + $2.20 + $14.10) × 11,000

= $27.50 × 11,000

= $302,500

Therefore for computing the total amount of product costs we simply applied the above formula.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The market for corn in country A is highly competitive. At the current market price of​ $5/bushel there is a shortage of​ 100,00
    12·1 answer
  • Mauve company permits employees to occasionally use the copying machine for personal purposes. the copying machine is located in
    15·1 answer
  • Company policy for internal control should include all of the following except
    14·1 answer
  • This company reports only total factory overhead on the schedule of cost of goods manufactured and attaches a separate schedule
    9·1 answer
  • The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price is $1,090,00
    8·1 answer
  • You bought one of Great White Shark Repellant Co.'s 8 percent coupon bonds one year ago for $810. These bonds make annual paymen
    15·1 answer
  • Scanner-based research is a system of gathering information from a group of respondents by continuously monitoring the promotion
    15·1 answer
  • What is the term used to describe the dollar amount of a physical damage claim paid by the policyholder?A. Coinsurance clause.
    12·1 answer
  • The portfolio with the lowest standard deviation for any risk premium is called the_______. A.efficient frontier portfolio B.CAL
    10·1 answer
  • How long will it take a nitrogen dioxide molecule to travel 25m at stp?​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!