Answer:
a. consistent criteria are used in evaluating options
Explanation:
A consistent criteria used when evaluating options actually makes conclusions to be objective.
When options are evaluated, the premises/criteria that support that particular conclusion should be consistent. Therefore, the rationale behind a conclusion being objective is consistency.
It's d. Lifetime.
The term of the federal judges is defined as "during good behaviour" (this is written in Article III of the constitution). So; if they always display a good behaviour there is no reason why they shouldn't be a federal judge for life.
Most of them were from Western Africa.<span />
By virtue of their familiarity in a foreign country or region, IGOs and NGOs are a valuable source of information for a Joint Task Force commander who may have neither access to nor current information about the affected country or region.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
NGOs and IGOs are sources of information when certain forces do not tend to have the same. NGOs and IGOs are known for collecting information about the affected country or region. They consist of specialized people who have a better understanding or idea of what kind of data they are going to collect.
Although they tend to collect such data, they hardly disclose the same as it is for their purpose. Moreover, it is difficult to rely on data published by the government due to a lack of accuracy.
Answer:Assimilation
Explanation:Assimilation is a cognitive process in which we relate the new learned infomation to the preexisting Information. It is a concept suggested by Piaget on cognitive development in children , children are always learning new information in order to develop their knowledge and if 4 year old has learned what a whistle is and what sounds it makes , they are likely to associate anything that makes the similar sound to a Whistle.
