Answer:he didn't want to
Explanation:
because he just didn't feel like
According to the questions, the guiding questions of reader-response criticism are:
-what about this text is remarkable or beautiful?
-what does the text teach the reader?
-how did the author achieve the beauty or a remarkableness of the text?
Explanation:
The literary theory of Reader-response criticism aims to focus on the reader or the scholar and encourage them to put in action their experience in literature.
The upper questions help the reader to be a critic in the response. The other questions, that are not included here, require a unique answer and there is no room for other answers.
The three things necessary for a change in character to be believable are the following:
-It’s slow (gradual).
-It’s not linear.
-It’s complete.
A change arc in a character has to have a setup, a reaction and a counter-reaction/conclusion; these stages are gradual and end with a more round character, in a conclusive way that is satisfactory in the sense that the change was complete.
Answer:
D. Awkward modifier. (The sentence does not contain an infinitive or a participle, so B and C are out.)
Explanation:
Answer:
Bell succeeded because he had more financial resources than Meucci.
Explanation:
In the given passage, the narrator talks about how the idea of inventing the telephone came to be. Though two people have the same idea to make a working communicative machine, only one succeeded.
Antonio Meucci was working on his talking telegraph while Alexander Graham Bell was working on the telephone. While both men have the same idea, Meucci's did not work because of financial constraints, which Bell has, in the form of his father-in-law. This enabled Bell to succeed in further developing and eventually bringing forth the telephone.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
