During WWII, they called themselves the "Arsenal of Democracy", meaning that they were the democratic nation that could deal out all of Democracy's justice for the rest of the world (I know, right). Also, the US had conflicts with the Soviet Union, which was the lead communist country. Really, the US was the only one that could match the Soviet Unions power. While the US was the first to build the atomic bomb, Soviet Union soon caught up and built one five years later. Same thing happened with nuclear missiles. The space race was first started by the USSR when they sent Sputnik into space. Therefore, through everlasting conflict with the Soviet Union as well as the fact that the US had many thousands of nukes, America thought it right to be globally responsible for communism
Hope this helped! Sorry it was a bit long :D
Well, its a place where it doesn't get much water, really dry
the dollar dimplomact in latin america delivered credits to remote nations. it had greated economic influence for the united states. the dollar diplomacy of the united states was a type of american remote arrangement to facilitates its points in latine america and easta asia through utilization of its monetary poer by ensuring credits made to outside nations.
i hope this somewhat helps :)
Explanation:
The Rev. Dr Martin Luther King as so important because he came to symbolise the Civil Rights movement. He did not invent it, and he was not the only leader in it - but he captured the public imagination more than anyone else. Such things as the “I Have A Dream” speech may have been taken (almost word for word) from other Civil Rights speakers (just as his doctoral thesis was actually the work of another person) - but it was the way he delivered a speech and the time-and-place that was important. In the 1960s if people had heard of only one Civil Rights leader it was Martin Luther King. Without in any way being insulting , he was a “showman” - and it was GOOD that he was a showman. A quiet academic theologian would not have got any public attention or been able to inspire a mass movement.
Yes his private conduct left a lot to be desired (and which of us is without sin?) and his political opinions tended to go into some strange places in the 1960s - but the basic point remains. Was Segregation a great moral evil? Yes it was. Who did more than any other person to campaign against it? To turn the public against it? Martin Luther King was that person.
