Utilitarian ethics is a theory suggests that if playing the killer in simulated killing leads to more unhappiness than not doing so, then playing the killer is wrong.
About Utilitarian ethics
An ethical theory known as utilitarianism establishes right from wrong by emphasising results. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that will result in the greatest benefit for the largest number of people is the most morally right one. For instance, the utilitarian viewpoint holds that you should select the flavour of ice cream that will make you feel the happiest if you are making a decision for yourself. If you like chocolate but detest vanilla, go with chocolate for the delight it will provide and stay away from vanilla as it will make you unhappy.
Consequentialist, welfareist, impartial, and aggregationist are the four distinguishing traits shared by all ethical systems in the utilitarian family. They consequently place the highest moral priority on advancing everyone's general well-being.
To know more about utilitarianism:
brainly.com/question/29313132
#SPJ4
<span>The first question that leaders ask themselves is usually: What needs to be done
The most common thing that every effective leaders tend to have is that all of them are very goal oriented.
Every steps that they take is an effort that they made so they're one step closer to the goals that they wanted to achieve </span>
Answer:
WellI think it was New York
Answer:
- Sex work should be legalized because criminalization is worse
- For Mexican women, choosing sex work is reasonable, given their very limited alternatives
- Sex work should be legalized because the problems associated with it are merely perceptions connected with unfair moral judgments
Explanation:
The work of anthropologist Patty Kelly aimed to present the factors that lead to sex work, its consequences and the social and economic pressure that workers in this field, especially women, are subjected to. Kelly also presents, in this work, a reflection on the legalization of sex work, especially in communities that are highly devalued and ignored by the policies of their regions. In this work, Kelly concludes, after analyzing all the data presented at work, that sex work must be legalized, because its criminalization does not prevent it, but worsens it and does not give any protection to workers, especially women who do not have other work options, but they need money to survive.
This is an example or description of "a<span>rgument against the person, abusive".</span>
It is a wrong
argumentative methodology whereby original discourse of the current subject is dodged
by rather assaulting the character, intention, or other quality of the
individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, as
opposed to countering the substance of the contention itself. Usually known as “Ad
hominem”.