The investigation and assessment of the effects that various events or incidents can have on the organization is referred to as :Business Impact Analysis.
<h3>What is Business Impact Analysis?</h3>
Business Impact Analysis is used to evaluate, measure and analyze the impact an event such as fire disaster has on a business.
Hence, Business Impact Analysis is important for business as it help to investigate and assess the effect an incident have on a business or an organization which will inturn can help to finds ways to reduce the loss incurred.
Learn more about Business Impact Analysis here:brainly.com/question/14602072
#SPJ1
Answer:
Unified the allies front against the axis
Explanation:
The United States was a key player in the Second world war. As the Japanese forces rallied at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, they took the Americans by surprise. What resulted was a mammoth loss of life totaling around 2300 people. A massive impact on the American navy fleet and chief of all, a huge depletion of the American oil storage. Had the Japanese pressed further, almost all the oil reserves in the tankers held at the harbor would have been destroyed. On this account, the war could have even lasted much more longer.
The attack on the Harbor dealt a huge blow on the American people, it united a divided nation for war. What followed was a deadly response from American. It spurred the nation to go for the war.
A scalawag who has taken to begging on street corners while posing as a blind person!!Hope this helps you!
They had to pay a 10$ fee to live there, sometimes 60$ and some people hunted buffolo for sport.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
