The last two answers are wrong automatically because they make no sense what so ever. The first answer is wrong because putting it in that sentence doesn't sound correct. So the answer would be B. Peter didn't know <em>which</em> was his.
Hope this helps! :)
In modern America, we do not punish immoral behavior. We have a judicial system that addresses illegal behavior, but illegal and immoral are not necessary the same thing. For example, committing adultery is an immoral act but not an illegal one.
Only behavior that breaks the law can be punished; these punishments, furthermore, must not be "cruel and unusual." Dante's punishments, on the other hand, would definitely be considered cruel and unusual by modern American standards.
Today, we punish immoral (but not illegal) behavior by public shaming. That is, a woman who has been cheated on will often take to social media to publicly shame her husband. By bad behavior "going viral," people are punished for bad behavior outside a formal punishment. It should be noted, however, that public shaming might be considered cruel and unusual, so Dante might just have approved!
Out of the choices given, attacking the person instead of the argument is a type of logical fallacy called ad hominem. The correct answer is C, ad hominem.
1- to begin with
2- for example
3- besides OR of course
4- furthermore
5- such as
I’m not so sure but it seems like it could be.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
It sounds like you are understanding what is being spoken about and you are showing that you are caring about what the person is saying while giving them your undivided attention.
