Answer:
Explanation:
These all were neo-Freudian. They followed Freud's work. They all were agreed with Freud's term of childhood experiences but they were not agreed on the emphasis at sex. They focused on social and environmental development and their effects on culture. The neo-Freudian was criticized because they tend to philosophical rather than give any scientific research. For example, we discuss Jung's collective unconscious, he just focused on myth, dream, and arts. Neo-Freudian based their theory of personality which was analyzed from their patient's records. These all were similar in their philosophical perspectives.
Answer: the major piece of advice from my texbook that Heather needs to be reminded is that "there is no such thing as a perfect speech".
Explanation:
Since we are human beings and it's within our nature to commit mistakes and audiences tend to praise what they like to listen and not the truth, we could say that speeches can be good but not perfect.
Explanation:
When it comes to Mexico and democracy within this country, there have been many changes during their existence since their independence in 1821. The reason México never established a long term democracy, is because there were many invasions and that made a country weaker than it should have been. Therefor, Mexico does not have a constant, stable constitution. The change was pretty solid back in the 1910 when the constitution of that year was established.
You may tell someone to do one thing but they do the other which causes conflict between you and/or others.
