The research question "Is recycling effective in the United States?" isn't effective because:
- It is too broad
- It is not specific enough.
<h3>What is a research question?</h3>
A research question refers to a question on which the whole research is based. While framing a research question the researcher must consider that the question is neither too broad nor too narrow to answer.
The question must be specific and should be capable of giving an opinion.
The given question is too broad as it covers a variety of aspects and to precisely answer this question is difficult. Also, the question doesn't specify the intention of the research.
Therefore the correct options are c and g.
Learn more about the research question here:
brainly.com/question/25686595
Answer:
Option c
Explanation:
Dr. King’s main points are as follows: we were promised freedom; now is the time to honor that promise; and we will not be satisfied until we are free.
It is important to know the author's purpose because knowing the author's purpose can change how the story is being told. If someone said,"Mom, I would really like this new video game for my birthday." and the author's purpose was to inform, it would be informing the mom that the person wanted the video game. If the author's purpose was to persuade, that person would be persuading the mom to get him the video game.
Explanation:
The first story, Rules of the Game by Amy Tan, has a first person point of view, but Tan also allows readers to view the daughter and mother at the same time. Just like other first person stories, the protagonist Waverly Jong is the narrator who tells us the story. As I read through the story, I am immersed into the story, which is one of the strengths of first person point of view. From the story,
It is very obvious. If the story was told using a different point of view, it will be changed drastically. For example, Waverly’s point of view represents the symbolism of “The art of invisible strength”, which means self control. If the story has a different point of view, the meaning of self control will become useless. And in the perspective of characterization, the point of view is also important. Since we see the story through Waverly’s eyes, we know what Waverly judges and thinks about the other characters, and what Waverly thinks about herself. She believes her accomplishment is based on her talent in chess, which leads to the climax rising action of Waverly running away. We see how Waverly was irritated by her mother, and again, if the story is not told by Waverly, we would not be able to understand that she did not mean to hurt her mother with the words of “Why do you have to use me to show off? If you want to show off, then why don’t you learn to play chess?” Or if the story is told in a third person point of view, like the old woman Waverly knocked into in the instance, we probably see a rude and unreasonable young girl who argues with her mother in the middle of a street.
No, It does not have a fragment.
