The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
Answer:
Attitude towards the Negroes.
Explanation:
After the independence in America, slavery was considered illegal in the North as they were influenced by the ideas of John Locke that considered all men to be equal and free. The emancipation society in the North wanted to get over the system of slavery. The white Southerners succeeded in strengthening the institution.
Before the Civil War, the North continued to show their disinterest in the practice of slavery while the South continued to support it as it was part of their economy. Several compromises and laws were implemented to keep intact the slavery practices to expand in new territories.
After the Civil War, The South despite being losing the war tried to restrict the movement of African American as they were now freed. The KKK establish to terrorise the blacks. Segregation laws were implemented like Jim Crow Law.
