1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesnalui [34]
3 years ago
15

How the mobility of the colonists forced colonial governments to be liberal.

History
1 answer:
andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
3 0
The mobility of the colonist forced colonial governments to be a liberal because the colonist were always on the move and they wanted to please the colonist that were coming in and have an open mind. The first colleges found it in the American colonies were bite we're by England men OK British men so that is how that happened and the factors that made public education important and most of new England colonies is that they wanted people to know their stuff and be educated..
You might be interested in
Based on this philosophy, what do you think Machiavelli would think of
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

It’s common to describe ruthless or devious politicians as “Machiavellian.” But rarely in the United States have we seen an embodiment of the traits Machiavelli admired quite like Donald Trump, the president-elect.

Go down the list of Trump’s controversial characteristics and you will find many of the qualities the cynical Machiavelli thought were essential for a tough leader. Trump can be a liar, which the Florentine philosopher believed was sometimes a necessary part of leadership. He can be a bully, like some of the Italian potentates Machiavelli lauded. He has boasted of a voracious sexual appetite, like Machiavelli himself.

To say that Trump displays attributes that Machiavelli deemed necessary in the fractious, perpetually warring states of the 16th century is not to recommend him as a modern leader. Nobody would want a neo-feudal dictator to lead a 21st-century democracy, you might think. But the American public voted Tuesday for Trump, perhaps in part because it shares Machiavelli’s concept of strength, or as he liked to call it, “virtue

Explanation:

hey here is your answer

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
Galileo was threatened with the punishment of _____ if he published his astronomical findings
miss Akunina [59]
I believe the answer is house arrest.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the impact of the popular forms of entertainment in the late 1800s.
Dima020 [189]
They were inexpensive and readily available to large numbers of people
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does each column show ?
Ket [755]
The chart is showing the differences and similarities between the opposers and supporters of the Alien and Sedition Acts
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Heeeelp❤️ 25 points!!!
    6·2 answers
  • What did the antislavery movment arise and grow
    11·2 answers
  • What are four policies of Harding and Coolidge toward business
    11·1 answer
  • Who was arrested after the Boston massacre
    6·2 answers
  • Took a picture of the question below, i really need help thanks!
    12·1 answer
  • Key figures in art, architecture, and literature during the Middle Age
    12·1 answer
  • Why is the power in the united states divided between several branches
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the West in favor of the Force Bill?
    5·1 answer
  • What are two reasons why Jackson won the 1828 election
    6·2 answers
  • Where can we find happiness according to Aristotle?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!