Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
Take, for instance, the world of science. Scientists have to get or obtain, then organise, analyse, record and interpret all the data they have collected. On that basis, the world is enriched culturally and scientifically with reliable and mostly accurate research on our lives, our history, our role in the Universe.
Then, go back to revisit our history, starting with Galileo or Da Vinci who was a painter, an engineer and an inventor of his own time. Painters , for instance, throughout the human history, have communicated states of mind through symbols or simply innovated Art by their unthoughtful means of communication: brushes.
Humans are naturally good. We just do bad stuff. Being evil is taught, not in nature. No person is born evil. They do evil stuff. Most evil things are done with bad intentions. But people can change. People can change from ‘evil’ to good.
Answer:In the text: Armed with cameras and cell phones, they were invading the lions' territory in hopes of capturing the perfect photograph.
The connotative tone of the verbs in this text implies that the photographers were a negative presence in the wild animal’s space. The way the author describes it is in a negative connotation.
Using the verbs arm, invade and capture to express that the actions of this tourists were annoying the lions.
Explanation:
Let's cut the chit chat, and formalities. I'm not one for greetings or unnecessary niceties.
The answer is A.
Why?
Because a run-on consists of two or more independent clauses that are not separated by a colon or semicolon.
This is evident in Choice A
