1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
belka [17]
3 years ago
11

During the period from the Constitutional Convention until the final ratification of the Constitution, Federalists and Anti-Fede

ralists made different arguments about the proper form of government for the United States.
History
2 answers:
NNADVOKAT [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is TRUE that during the period from the Constitutional Convention until the final ratification of the Constitution, Federalists, and Anti-Federalists made different arguments about the proper form of government for the United States.

This is evident in the fact both of the group initially started by publishing the articles to support their position on the constitution drafting. The anti-federalists published sixteen papers between 1787 to 1788, while the federalists published eighty-five papers.

Also during the actual convention, each of the groups continued to make different arguments about the proper form of government for the United States. The argument eventually led to the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution.

jenyasd209 [6]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

federalists wanted a stronger central government where as the anti-federalists wanted a stronger government or the states. hope this helps

You might be interested in
1. Which of the following best explains why President Roosevelt proposed his 1937 “court-packing” plan?
Romashka [77]

B is the correct answer.

Roosevelt was frustrated that the Supreme Court kept rejecting New Deal programs as unconstitutional.

In the end, the Supreme Court caved and Roosevelt was publicly derided for trying to pack the Court before failing

2. A is the correct answer.

the FDIC exists to insure that if you put money in a bank, that money will always be safe even if the Bank loans it out.

4 0
4 years ago
Which of the following impacts are direct results of successful government regulation?
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

1

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Question 9 of 10
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

B. Checks the person's credit history to make sure he or she pays on time

4 0
2 years ago
Read the quote by A. Philip Randolph and answer
Simora [160]

Answer: african americans have power if they join together and pressure can bring about change

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the similarities and differences between the monarchies in Vietnam
WARRIOR [948]

Answer:       Throughout history, there have been many different countries and societies, and those populations could never function properly without a form of leadership. Government is important with running a country; no civilization has lasted without some kind of decree from leader(s). The number of Governments that have existed at some point in time is big one, but today an absolute monarchy, a constitutional monarchy, a direct democracy, and an authoritarian Government will be highlighted. Government is an important part of countries, and out of the many civilizations in the world there are many kinds of Government.

Absolute Monarchy was a Government with a sovereign leader who came into power by marriage or offspring; they had complete control with no limitations from constitution or law. They were considered the head of state and head of Government. Most Absolute Monarchies followed the Divine Right of the Kings - The Divine Right implies to everyone that the Monarch in power is a representative of God, and by default, didn’t have to answer to anybody but God. This was a factor in keeping the people under control, and took away the right to question the Monarch’s authority. Although it is very clear that Monarchs of Absolute Monarchies are free to do anything with their authority that they want, patterns in history have proved that to achieve true Absolute Monarchy, the support of others was necessary. Monarchs were often influenced by or shared power with other interests. The church was incredibly influential, and some power was shared with the clergy because of their strong influence on the citizens. Nobility could play a role as well. If there was enough opposition on something the Monarch did, power could be reduced. There have been quite a few Absolute Monarchies throughout history, and the ‘strongest’ one was Louis XIV of France. There was no other power than him - meaning there were no legislative, judicial, or executive powers. No matter what he said, even if it was sentencing someone to death, it was final. The Czars of Russia are another great example; until 1905, the Czars had complete power over their subjects. The idea of Divine Right and the power of the Czars was so deeply relevant in their history and culture that it took a long time for absolutism to be abolished. Absolutism by itself can be described a lot alike to what an Absolute Monarchy is - the ruling individual has ‘absolute’ power, with no legal, electoral or other confrontation to that power. However, an Absolute Monarchy does not exist anymore, but the format of a Monarchy still remains.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One main reason for the fall of the Mongol Empire was
    11·1 answer
  • What is a step you can take toward committing to a career path
    12·2 answers
  • Can someone explain who Thurgood Marshall was and how he was a hero <br> PLEAE HELP
    12·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    8·1 answer
  • how was imperialism after the industrial revolution similar to imperialism in earlier periods of history
    13·2 answers
  • ,explain why women struggled for so long to
    11·2 answers
  • What are cons for "Every Student Succeeds Act"?
    7·1 answer
  • What things did Sparta do to humiliate Athens after their surrender
    8·1 answer
  • 15. The 13 colonies were ruled by which colony?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following made foreign goods more expensive and northern goods more competitive a.the cotton gin b. Tariffs c. Decr
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!