Oh ya, that means that every bed has soft comfront and the promise is, evry bed is nice to relax in.
Answer:For more than a century, lawmakers have been passing minimum wage laws. Minimum wage is the lowest amount per hour that bosses can pay their employees. Many people do not like the idea of ...Minimum wage laws set the lowest hourly rate an employer can legally pay certain workers. The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 per hour. Where states and municipalities have enacted their ...Though experts do not expect lawmakers to raise this amount in 2017, the Department of Labor has stated that federal contract employees will receive a minimum of $10.20 this year (tipped employees will get $6.80).This decline in purchasing power means low-wage workers have to work longer hours now just to ... Act of 2019, a bill that would raise the federal minimum wage in six steps to $15 per hour by 2024.
Explanation:
If you asked your friend to hand you a book and he handed you a pencil instead, it is phonology as a language system that is most likely broken down. Phonology deals with systems of sounds which includes phonetics in a specific language.
The answer would be the first choice.
Answer:
The verb is "paints", the direct object is "the house", and the indirect object is "for his family".
Explanation:
- "Paints" is a transitive verb conjugated in the third person singular of the Simple Present Tense. Transitive verbs are the ones that take objects.
- "The house" is the direct object which is the recipient of the action of a transitive verb.
- "For his family" is the indirect object or the person affected by the action of the transitive verb.
Answer:
To Diana George, poverty is represented by non-profit organizations such Habitat for Humanity in a way of despair, or something that can be easily seen or recognized. Or in the case of this organization and many others, it tries as to find an surfire way to make others empathise with poverty. The problems George identifies as a result of this tactic is that poverty is not always easily recognized, and on even questions that “If it doesn’t look like poverty, then how do we adress it?” (p. 450) The largest, most pressing issue is that seeing poverty in one way instead limits our understanding on how to deal with poverty.
At the very beginning of the article, George creates an anecdote of how she encounters charities. It details her going through her mail and looking over many other poverty organization’s mail. This shows their tactic, of presenting poverty as grim and ragged, while a quote from bell hooks before that states that seeing poverty in one way challenges how people look and deal with it. Providing these two largely contrasting viewpoints, in a way, makes them appeal to different audiences by expressing both her issue and a counterclaim to structure the remainder of textual analysis.
The purpose of George’s textual analysis is to ultimately show that representing poverty as weak and depraving only hinders the fight against it instead of resolving it. Everyday, it’s a question of who is poor and who is not, but that itself is becoming increasingly difficult to tell. This rudimentary mindset eventually leads George to state that “There are certainly many cultural and political reasons for these problems…but I would suggest that the way the way poverty countinues to be represented in this country and on tapes limits our understanding.” So if people continue to see poverty in this sight, the ones that are poor but still have a home or job will challenge this belief. People will not know how to deal with them, and this essentially why George criticizes non-profit organizations such as Health for Habitat
