Answer:
a) true.
Explanation:
In the present scenario, multidimensional leaders remain critically proactive to undertake strategic choices within a framework of continuously shifting situations and other relevant factors. In an ever-changing market world, leaders can not base themselves on traditional styles and aspire to tackle the realities of today's workplace. They recognize that effective leadership needs a variety of expertise and competencies, and recognize the impact of their personal traits on the specif task in hand.
Marta is making an argument for a job candidate she likes. she tells the other members of the hiring committee that all utsa graduates are trained in a <u>syllogism</u>.
A syllogism is a form of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at an end primarily based on propositions that are asserted or assumed to be real.
In its earliest form, syllogism arises whilst two true premises (propositions or statements) validly imply a conclusion or the principle point that the argument objectives to get across.
For instance, knowing that everyone guys are mortal (primary premise) and that Socrates is a person (minor premise), we might also validly conclude that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic arguments are commonly represented in a 3-line form.
Learn more about syllogism here: brainly.com/question/361872
#SPJ4
There really aren't choices to it, unless you state it in a more professional way. But here is how I would put it: The Relations between Native Americans and Colonists There are many reasons Native Americans and European Colonists did not have a good relationship. The reason for conflict between Colonist and Indians was due to the Colonists insatiable greed for power and land.
