Answer:
Ang kuwentong-bayan (Ingles: folklore) ay mga kathang isip na kuwento o salaysay na ang mga kumakatawan ay ang mga pag-uugali at mga uri ng mga mamamayan sa isang lipunan. Ito ay nabuo ng mga manunulat upang kanilang maipahayag ang mga sinaunang pamumuhay at upang maging gabay ng mga tao sa kasalukuyang pamumuhay. Maari nilang gawing basehan lalo na ang mga wastong pag-uugali at mga aral na gustong ibigay ng kuwento.
• Ang mga halimbawa nito ng kuwentong bayan ay ang sumusunod:
1. Mito
2. Alamat
3. Pabula
4. Parabula
5. Maikling kuwentong bayan
• Ang mga halimbawa sa itaas ay lumaganap at nagpasalin salin na sa ibat-ibang henerasyon sa pamamagitan din ng pagkuwento ng mga matatanda sa mga nakababata.
• Ito ay anyong panitikan ng isang bansa mula sa mga katutubong panitikan. Mayroon ng kuwentong bayan ang mga ninuno noon bago pa man tayo nasakop ng mga kastila at iba pang dayuhang mananakop.
• Ang kuwentong bayan ay isang panitikan na may kaugnayan sa ugali, tradisyon, pamumuhay ng mga tao sa iisang pook, rehiyon o lupain. Malaki ang ambag nito sa pagpapanatili ng kultura, tradisyon panitikan at lahi ng mga Pilipino.
• Dahil sa kuwentong bayan napapanatili pa din ang mga nakaugaliangg tradisyon at pamumuhay ng mga tao noong unang panahon.
Answer:
a forcible overthrow of a government or social order, in favor of a new system.
Explanation:
Answer:
the president will get to enjoy the luxurious benefits that come with the president is also granted 50,000 annual expense account 100,000
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
Answer:
Correct answer is Spain abandoned its territorial claims on lands north of Florida and east of the Mississippi.
Explanation:
First option is wrong because there is no territory south of Florida that was an issue between two countries.
Second one also is wrong because Spain couldn't claim territories to the North of Florida, or west of New Orleans, as they were not part of the dispute and were American territories.
Third option is correct as the Spaniards dropped claims on all territories east of Mississippi, without Florida, of course.
Fourth option is wrong as New Orleans remained in the hands of Spain.
