<span>Certainly not. The United States has never, since its founding, consisted of a small number of citizens, still less of citizens that could practically assemble in one place at one time and debate their actions. A pure democracy in this classical Greek city-state sense was never practical, and was not seriously considered.
What the Framers created was a constitutional representative republic. Sovereignty is vested in the people, like a democracy (and unlike a constitutional monarchy), but the people do not rule directly. Instead, they elect representatives, at regular intervals, and these rule in the peoples' stead. Their powers are limited, first, by the fact that they are elected for only short terms, and must be re-elected if they wish to continue in power, and secondly, and much more importantly, by the Constitution itself, which puts express written limits on their powers even between elections.</span>
Richard Lion-heart is England's King and Saladin was a Muslim military and political leader who as Sultan led Islamic forces during the Crusades.
Not entirely sure but I believe it is the Antebellum Period
Hope I Helped!
Compared to the rest of American history, recent congresses have been less polarized and more productive in terms of passing laws.
<h3>What is congress?</h3>
Congress is a group meeting usually held by a number of individual or people.
The meeting is formal and usually involved delegate form different parties or group.
Congress are more productive as to passing and endorsing bills.
Therefore, compared to the rest of American history, recent congresses have been less polarized and more productive in terms of passing laws.
Learn more on congress below
brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ1
Answer:
After the Yalta Conference of February 1945, Stalin, Churchill, and U.S. President Franklin D. ... Roosevelt had agreed to meet following the surrender of Germany to determine the postwar borders in Europe.
Explanation:
