Answer:
Interrater reliability between the two data collectors was high
Step-by-step explanation:
Explanation-
- Interrater reliability is the consistency of observations between two or more observers.
- An Agreement of 54 out of 56 scores would indicate a high level of interrater reliability.
- The data collection method was appropriate for pressure ulcer risk assessment.
- The risk assessments did not have to be done by both evaluators at the same time.
It is not a function because there can't be two of the same number on the x-axis.
When b=0
f(x)=ax^2+c
test each
A. with x^2-1, A is false
B. with -x^2-1, B is false
C. cannot find contradiction
D. the axis is actually x=0, 0 is nithere positive nor negative, false
answer is C
3y = -2x + 2
y = x + 4 (Substitute the y)
3(x + 4) = -2x + 2 (Distribute)
3x + 12 = -2x + 2 (Add 3 to both sides)
+3x +3x
------------------------------------------
12 = 1x + 2 (Subtract 2 from both sides)
-2 - 2
------------------------
10 = 1x (Divide by 1 on both sides)
10/1 = 1x/1
x = 10
This is your x-coordinate
