Answer:
Conventional or stylistic decorative design is an adaptation from nature. Naturalistic design is a realistic adaptation from nature. Abstract and geometric decorative design has no direct relation to nature.
Answer:
<em>C. How on Earth, Jenny thought, could the concert have already started when she had left an hour early?</em>
Explanation:
This is the answer because, it says that "Jenny thought" and if it was using a 1st person point of view it would simply say "I thought". And it also says that when "she" had left an hour early. If it was a 1st person point of view it would also simply say "I". And it couldn't be option A, because it said "we" when the sentence (if it was trying to be in third person) should've used "they".
It can't have been option B, because it says, "in my experience" and if you were writing it in first person it would have been "in their experience", or "in (name)'s experience".
It also couldn't have been option D. Simply because it says, "As for me" and uses "I" instead of they, she, he, or even their name.
To make it short, option A, B, and D, do not have the correct wording to be a third-person sentence.
So, in conclusion, the only third-person sentence is option C.
And that's my answer.
The answer is: There is no error.
Complex sentences consist of a subordinate or dependent clause, which is introduced by a subordinating conjunction like <em>even though</em>, and an independent clause, which can stand on its own. They can be separated by a comma.
In the example sentence, the subordinate clause is:
Even though I had no previous experience,
Finally, the independent clause is:
I enjoyed painting the living room with my friends.
The rest of the alternatives are incorrect because the clauses are separated or do not express the same meaning as the original sentence.
Hey There!!
I think the answer to this is: The 3 one is. A Relative. The 4 one is. A noun. And, The last one is. adverbial.
~
~✨
Elie Wiesel believed that commemorating the Holocaust was not a job but an obligation and that the only way to combat lingering apathy worldwide was to share his own narrative as well as the stories of other victims.
Elie Wiesel discusses the shaky link between indifference and humanity throughout "The Perils of Indifference." He thought that those who chose to ignore the suffering and anguish occurring all around the world were endangering the very nature of mankind, and that the pervasive nature of indifference still posed the greatest challenge to a just and enduring peace.
<h3>
What did Elie Wiesel take out from the situation?</h3>
Everyone possesses bravery, faith, hope, and courage, and how they are used has an impact, as Elie Wiesel shows in Night. Elie accomplishes this by using the events that took place in Auschwitz. Everyone forgets to apply these crucial qualities when they are in pain occasionally.
Elie's identity underwent constant change as a result of the horrific events that the Jewish community endured.
To learn more about Elie Wiesel, visit
brainly.com/question/16258201
#SPJ4
