Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
Where is the chart? Then I can answer
Answer:
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
D) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
This would be the best way to explain what this conclusion means. The hypothesis states that more than 21% of the population suffers from professional problems due to extreme shyness. Moreover, the null hypothesis states that there is no meaningful relationship between two measured phenomena. If we "fail to reject" the hypothesis, this means that we do not have evidence that shows that the hypothesis is not true. Therefore, we can claim that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Shows the situation of Japan after the bombing.
On the night between March 9 and 10, 1945, 334 B-29 bombers rained hell over the densest city on the planet. Nearly half a million incendiary bombs hit Tokyo in Operation Meetinghouse, probably the worst mass bombing of civilians by aerial bombing ever. Their numbers, estimated between 80,000 and 140,000 fatalities, are, on average, worse than those in Hiroshima (70,000 to 122,000).
Here is the Necessary and Proper Clause:
<em>"The Congress shall have Power To ...make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." </em><em>ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 18</em>
<span>
This was put in place so that congress had the power to create new laws and sections through time and change in order to grow congruent with the change and growth of america (socially and economically). Basically, Congress can make any laws and try to pass them, as long as they don't interfere with the original unalienable right put into place by the constitution.
</span><span><em>
</em></span>
