All categories

3 years ago

HLEPPPPPPPPPP ME PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Mathematics

2 answers:

alina1380 [7]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Perimeter = 60 cm :D

Step-by-step explanation:

brainliest uwu?

Orlov [11]3 years ago

4 0

60 cm is the answer:)

You might be interested in

The government of Preon (a small island nation) was voted in at the last election with 58% of the votes. That was 2 years ago, a

mel-nik [20]

Answer:

a) $z=\frac{0.684 -0.58}{\sqrt{\frac{0.58(1-0.58)}{114}}}=2.250$

b) $p_v =2*P(z>2.250)=0.0244$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given we see that $p_v$ we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=114 represent the random sample taken

$\hat p=0.684$ estimated proportion of people that their approval rating might have changed

$p_o=0.58$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Hypothesis

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that true proportion of people that their approval rating might have changed is 0.58 or no.:

Null hypothesis: $p=0.58$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.58$

Part a

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.684 -0.58}{\sqrt{\frac{0.58(1-0.58)}{114}}}=2.250$

Part b: Statistical decision

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z>2.250)=0.0244$

If we compare the p value and the significance level given we see that $p_v$ we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance.

7 0

3 years ago

Baxter is thinking about buying a car. The table below shows the projected value of two different cars for three years.

saw5 [17]

Car 1: It is an exponential function that is given as P = 18,500 (0.9595)ⁿ and the price after 10 years is $12,235.5.

Car 2: It is a linear function that is given as 2000x + 3y = 55500 and the price after 10 years is $11,833.33.

And Yes, there is a significant difference.

<h3>What is a function?</h3>

A function is a statement, rule, or law that establishes the connection between two variables. In mathematics, functions are everywhere and are necessary for constructing physical connections.

Baxter is thinking about buying a car. The table below shows the projected value of two different cars for three years.

Car 1 (value in dollars)

Year 1: 18,500

Year 2: 17,390

Year 3: 16,346.60

Car 2 (value in dollars)

Year 1: 18,500

Year 2: 17,500

Year 3: 16,500

The exponential function describes car 1.

Then the function will be

$\rm P = 18500\times (0.95995)^n$