The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
<u>Advertising Agencies</u>
Explanation:
Remember the product liability doctrine is a <em>claim</em> by a user or buyer of a product because of injury or damage caused by a defective product of a manufacturer after provision of reasonable proof.
Because Advertising Agencies do not produce these products but only advertise, the doctrine of strict product liability does not apply to advertising agency law which is <em>only dedicated to creating, planning, and handling advertising and other forms of promotion and marketing for clients.</em>
Answer:
limited government I think
Answer:
Commander in chief and head of the judicial branch
Explanation:
Answer:
People like to call in and request to be anonymous because they know they are being nosy, or dramatic about a situation. Not always the reason though. But anonymous calls tend to have wrong information in them and can sometimes be completely false, and a way for one person to just try and get someone else in trouble. The problem with that is, you can't do a follow up depending on your department policy. Unless there is some sort of evidence, the person can't be charged, and by not having an available witness, it basically just makes the call a checkup to make sure no one is doing anything wrong.
No, unless a truly barbaric crime has occured, there should be no follow up. The caller wanted to be anonymous, so let them be anonymous unless they decide to come forward with more information.
Explanation:
