The correct answer is B) the Great Plains.
<em>The Cheyenne, who lived in tipis while hunted Buffalo, lived in the region of the Great Plains.
</em>
The Cheyenne tribes used to live in different regions of the Great Plains before the United States moved them to a region in Oklahoma in the 1800s. The Great Plains includes the states of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Indeed, the capital city of the state of Wyoming is called, Cheyenne, as a tribute to those tribes.
Answer: Unalienable rights
An added note of explanation:
You'll see both "unalienable" and "inalienable" used in description of these sorts of rights that cannot be taken away because they are not granted by man but are ever human being's natural possession. In the final version of the <em>Declaration of Independence, </em>the spelling <em>unalienable </em>was used. That was the copy of the document as transcribed by John Adams, which was used for printed copies to be made. Thomas Jefferson's original draft used the spelling <em>inalienable</em>. The two variations of the word were both in use at the time in the 18th century. Either way, the word means something that cannot be made alien to you -- in other words, something that is naturally your possession and cannot be taken away from you.
Answer:
3 minutes ago The geography of Mesopotamia led people to A. develop methods to control water, B.adopt hunting and gathering as a way of life.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.
“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.
OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.
Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.
Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….
