Answer:
All citizens are equal under the law, regardless of their wealth or social class, separation of powers.
Explanation:
The answer is True, that did happen.
Answer:
hope the answers helped you. pls mark as brainliest
Explanation:
In 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville took a 10-month trip to the United States to study the American penal system. In the resulting book—Democracy in America—he singled out one noteworthy feature: “Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions.” Although he ignored the fact of slavery, his reference to economic equality among white Americans was, at the time, accurate. According to economic historians Peter H. Lindert and Jeffrey G. Williamson, the share of national income going to the top one percent was less than 10 percent.Today, the share of national income going to the top one percent has doubled, while median wages have remained largely stagnant. In the last 40 years, CEO wages have grown nearly 100 times the rate of wages for average workers. The popularity of left-wing candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders—both with significant redistributive policies at the core of their platform—reflects the moral concerns many have about high levels of income inequality.
But no moral case for economic equality will convince those on the Right. What is at stake is an idea of fairness. It is unfair, so the thought goes, for others to live off one’s labor without making an equally productive contribution to society. This appeal to fairness trumps any moral case for income redistribution. There is, however, another case for relative equality of conditions that appeals to the same idea of fairness that’s appealed to by the opponents of redistribution. This view, which has largely been neglected since Tocqueville’s meditations on the subject, argues that a certain degree of economic equality is necessary for fair participation in political life.
The correct option is D. The Militia Act of 1792 makes provisions for the organization of state militias. This act was enacted to provide counter forces against invasions by Indians and other foreigners. It makes it mandatory for able body men between the ages of 18 and 45 to join a local militia organisation which is coordinated by the state. Members were allowed to armed themselves with particular types of weapons and members were required to report for training twice a year.
I would have to say because Judaism was why these people lived and even though they were separated they were still able to remember the things they were taught and so they taught their children who taught their children and so forth which allowed Judaism to survive, though no one believed it would.
