Answer:
Migration is variously characterized as an important determinant of violent conflict and political instability, national power, imperial expansion, ethnic conflict, radicalism, terrorism, environmental degradation, and economic growth or stagnation. In high immigration receiving states such as Australia and the United States—among the world's most inclusive migrant incorporation regimes—immigration increasingly complicates foreign policy making choices, and may present challenges to each host nation's internal cohesion.. Issues such as dual nationality, social exclusion, multiculturalism, and fear of international terrorism—especially in a post-9/11 context—generate considerable political heat and public debate.
2nd paragraph: Combatants in the immigration debate start from very different world views – not only emphasizing different values but almost speaking different languages. To avoid destructive backlashes, reformers must understand and respect the values and perspectives of all groups involved in public debates.Immigration—and public policies to manage it—arouses strong emotions and fierce social and political battles, not just in the United States but in most other countries across the world. Why is this true? Each nation has its own issues that inspire or enrage, of course, but there are widespread, underlying patterns that can be identified and taken into consideration by reformers.
Answer:
Taking into account that these are the alternatives:
A. Fostering efficiency in the workplace
B. Promoting business monopolies
C. Creating economics reform
D. Protecting social welfare
The correct option is B. Promoting business monopolies
The objective that progressivism had was essentially to give the power of the government to the people. It also wanted to change american lifestyle by eliminating injustice. The progressive movement also cared for different points, such as women rights, environmental issues and social welfare.
Answer is given below
Explanation:
major cultural differences between the Gulf and Plains cultures are
- Gulf natives belong to the karankawa cultural group. They are seafood containing turtle, fish and oysters. They lived in arid areas so they were not farmers. They lived wickiups.
- Plain Indians were skilled in cavalry. Whenever he attacked others, he used this skill. They are buffalo hunters and farmers. They made clothes from buffalo skin and fed them with meat. In plain language there are Zion and Alcoquian. The people here belong to the nomadic races and the Commonwealth cultural group. They lived Teepee.
Answer:
Either A or B, I would go with A
Explanation:
Charles Davies theories went against Christianity, as almost everyone back then strong believed in God, so Dawin's theories challenged their beliefs putting everyone in shock and also anger.
The US started to rely on its military and economic power to pursue foreign policy goals
