Submit your one or two-paragraph essay that evaluates the arguments presented within the article. Address these questions in you
r writing: Which argument was more convincing? Which article was better supported? How did the persuasive language affect the strength of the article? Article: the school garden debate
The argument against school gardens was more persuasive than the other school garden argument. The argument against school gardens was more persuasive because some people see school gardens as taking time away from classroom academics. Research also does not provide any proof that spending time in a school garden can lead to higher graduation rates. For supporters argument it states that “Nearly every research study for the past 100 years has shown that for students to perform well after graduation, schools must teach to the whole child and provide whole-school experiences.” Personally, I don’t think that school gardens will affect students after they graduate. This is how against supporters was more convincible than the other opponents.
Since Blacks and Hispanics are predominantly working in low-paying jobs, which are more likely to have been affected by pandemic and see more employment declines during recessions, the wage gap in the USA is likely to widen.
The correct answer among all the other choices is Hasty generalization. The sentence that "William Shakespeare was a genius and he believed there is a God" is a hasty generalization. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
