Your heart is both fragile and strong. It is strong in love, but it is easily broken. Its hard to break up with them because your love for them, your bond to them, is strong and they mean the world to you. Its like you're taking your own world from you. You're ripping away the part of you that you love the most; Them. The worst part about it though, Is that you're the one who is making the choice and you know it will kill them just as much as you. However, If it is absolutely best for both of you, It must be done. Im sorry you're going through this. If you need someone to talk to, you can talk to me if you need to. Good luck!
<span>know your exact credit score</span>
Answer:
The author of the article does not answer the question explicitly, but presents arguments that allow the reader to construct his own answer and see that dogfighting and football are not so different.
Explanation:
"How different are dogfighting and football?" is the subtitle of the article "Offensive Play" that presents a comparison between the violence of dogfighting and the violence of football games.
According to the article, dogfighting is illegal and somewhat inhuman and malicious, unlike football, these two elements have a lot in common. First of all, both football and dogfighting are extremely violent environments that can harm participants and in an intense and very debilitating way. In dogfighting, the dog's resistance and the ability to continue fighting is evaluated, even if it is seriously injured, since the dog that quits fighting is devalued and seen as inferior. In football, athletes are also judged on the resistance and strength they have, even in the midst of the violent blows they receive, and the player who does not resist is harassed by the crowd and even by teammates.
The author of the article presents these comparisons, stating implicitly that there are not so many differences between dogfighting and the football match, but allowing the reader to draw their own conclusions on the subject.
To be in favor of online learning means that you support it.
B.A Detroit study showed that a virtual program “has helped draw in new students, increasing enrollment and the state funding that follows” (Bushwellee S3.)
This statement describes the benefits of the online program while citation A calls online learning a disruptive innovation which is speaking negatively about online learning.
Citation B best supports an argument in favor of online learning.
