Answer: occurrs because of the REPRESENTATIVENESS HEURISTIC.
Explanation: Representativeness heuristic can be defined as the act of making conclusions under probability or uncertainty. Here conclusions are made based on representativeness which makes the conclusion less accurate because the fact that some is a representative doesn't make it a likely outcome.
It is an approach that employs a practical method not guaranteed to be optimal or perfect; not following or derived from any theory.
An example can be seen in the use of horoscopes.
Old Norse religion in long term perspectives
Answer:
C. examining body camera footage to determine the extent of excessive use of force among police departments.
Explanation:
In Statistics, sampling can be defined as a process used to collect or select data (objects, observations, or individuals) from a larger statistical population using specific procedures.
There are various types of sampling used by researchers and these are;
1. Random sampling.
2. Systematic sampling.
3. Stratified sampling.
4. Cluster sampling.
5. Opportunity or convenience sampling.
An unobtrusive data collection is a data collection technique used mainly in the social sciences to obtain or gather data without the researcher directly interfering or interfacing with the subject being studied. Thus, it doesn't influence the behavior, action or response of the subjects under study.
Hence, an example of unobtrusive data collection is examining body camera footage to determine the extent of excessive use of force among police departments.
After the collapse the Pope became isolated in rome and bishops started to operate on their own. It also resulted in a combination of secular and ecclesiastical activities and often the secular ones gained an upper hand.
Hope I helped!!!
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
