Answer:b) naturalistic observation
Explanation:
Naturalistic observation is a technique under which observation of the subject is done in its natural environment.
Usually this technique is used when lab research will be unreasonable.
How Does Naturalistic Observation Work?
This technique may be used just because people's responses may be more effective when they are in their comfortable environment than when they are in a lab for research purposes.
Sometimes the result of the research are more effective when the behaviour is observed in an exactly moment when it happens. By watching how people respond to certain situations and stimuli in real-life, psychologists can get a better idea of how and why people react.
Answer: they just saw a person and thought wow not bad
Explanation:
Social grants
Advantage: This will provide other people's need into having them to be provided with assistance.
Disadvantage: Not all people are provided with the help they ask as it is only chosen by a specific organization or the government.
Free basic education
Advantage: This will help people to have education of which who couldn't afford financially and could be assisted by a specific organization or government.
Disadvantage: Sometimes it lacks or it does not provide everything of the person really needs of which he or she is still lacking such as having materials that are only limited for use.
Free health care
Advantage: Their is a specific variety of which assigned medical professionals will help other people to care for their needs.
Disadvantage: There is only a specific field of which they provide and not all of those who are sick can be tended to.
Housing
Advantage: They may be able to provide shelters to those who can't have a place to stay.
Disadvantage: They may be able to provide shelter but not enough of those components of which a person needs such as having electricity or water of which other places of specific organizations can't provide.
Answer:
One party of Franks, namely, Peter, the Hermit Duke Godfrey, Baldwin, his brother, ... Robert the Norman, Hugh the Great, Everard of Puiset, Achard of Montmerle, ... The wise man, Bohemund, also said that if the Count should do the Emperor any ... We did not dare to go outside; we could find absolutely nothing to eat within
Explanation:
Raymond of Toulouse, Robert of Normandy, Robert of Flanders, ... It makes much more sense to suppose, in so far as one can ... For Bohemond, who was to become Prince of Antioch, his social status was elevated substantially. ... The next day Hugh again went out to talk with Godfrey,
Answer:
D
Explanation:
I think after doing some quick googling I feel like D is the correct choice.
The Dred Scott case was a major event on the road to the Civil War. The Supreme Court's ruling was a provocative opinion. It stated flatly that Blacks had "no rights which the white man was bound to respect" and rejected the right of any territory to ban slavery within its own borders.
The answer is D b/c they basically denied him his rights and told him that someone's property cannot sue and said that just because he lived in a free state doesnt make him free.
