Conscription in the U.S. is know as the "draft" and also more formally as the "Selective Service Act". Conscription was used to fill vacancies when there were not enough volunteers for the military. The Military and Service Act required all males between the ages of 18-26 to register and compelled, a polite way of saying "forced" males into military service when needed during times of war and necessity. During the Vietnam War in the 1960's and 70's, numerous individuals rebelled and burned their "draft cards" which had stated their requirement in joining the military through a lottery system. To this day the system of a draft exists and all males must register upon turning 18 and be available, if called upon, for training until 39 years of age.
Answer:
This can be classify by being the following falacy:
<u>A.
</u>
<u>Hasty generalization</u>
Explanation:
The person trying to give an argument in order to express the advantages of having Wal-Mart opened up uses a <u>Hasty generalitation</u> when talking about "Wal-Mart having great prices".
This affirmation is not consistent enough, because she is only giving one example to back up the statment: the store "has great prices". Saying she had a good price in one item, doesn´t mean all the items in the store have a low cost.
A falacy of this type, among other falacys give no valitdation to the argument someones is giving.
Answer:
Explanation:
A presidential democracy is a form of government in which the executive branch is elected separately from the legislative branch. A parliamentary democracy is a form of representative democracy in which political power is vested in an elected legislature, but the executive and legislative branches are not separate.
Answer: This is an example of "THE THIRD VARIABLE PROBLEM".
Explanation:
Third Variable Problem is a type of confounding where we use a third variable to make a relationship between two others. This third variable problem always tends to be a mistaken identity towards a course.
Because the research has assumed the activiness of children who eat more such, when compared to the children who eat less sugar to be caused by metabolism rate without any Experiment, but has chooses to prove his point with a known Experiment, on children children who eat more food when compared to children who eat less food. This is a third party problem, because he has choose to conclude the result of two variables ( activiness of children who eat less sugar Vs children who eat more sugar) with an unrelated variable( food metabolism in children).
