Answer:
investing
Explanation:
it is good to invest your money in things that you know will be of greater value in the future. For example, "Apple statistics" states that If you had bought $1,000 worth of Apple shares on January 9, 2007, the day Steve Jobs unveiled the original iPhone at MacWorld 2007, your investment would now be worth $26,103.
Answer:
2,845 units
Explanation:
To find the answer you need to consider that the profit is equal to the sales minus the costs.
Let's consider that x is the number of units sold
Sales= Price per unit*number of units sold
Sales= 37x
Variable cost= Cost per unit*number of units sold
Variable cost= 11x
Fixed cost= 18,470
55,498=37x-11x-18,470
55,498+18,470=26x
73,968=26x
x=73,968/26= 2,845
According to this, the answer is that they need to sell 2,845 units to make the desired profit.
Answer: The cost of reducing Air pollution
Explanation: The Cost to this firm of reducing Pollution by 12 tons is the amount of investment the company takes on its part to contain Carbon dioxide from its plant to the environment where the public lives.
<u>Answer: </u>
Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.
On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).
The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.
The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.
