1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataliya [291]
3 years ago
12

You're giving a speech to your class about the effect of having too much power in the executive branch. What historical event wo

uld be the most useful to include?
History
1 answer:
Reptile [31]3 years ago
7 0
I think you forgot to give the options along with this question. I am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. The historical event that would be most useful to include would be President Johnson's escalation of the Vietnam War after the Tonkin Gulf incident. I hope the answer helps you. <span />
You might be interested in
Why did Truman decide to drop the atomic bomb<br> on Hiroshima?
notsponge [240]

Answer:

Because they were becoming too much of a threat.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A simile is an example of nonverbal communication. True False
vichka [17]
<span>A simile is an example of nonverbal communication. </span>False
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which objective of american foreign policy in 1951 led to a united nations military intervention in the korean peninsula?
Greeley [361]
During the 1950's, the US had adopted a policy of containment. The goal was to stop the spread of communism on a global scale. This included giving financial and military aid to countries who might fall into the hands of a communist government. A perfect example of this would be South Korea.

During the early 1950's, North Korea (a communist country) invaded South Korea. America, worried about the spread of communism, wanted to ensure that South Korea stayed free of this communist system. To do this, the US helped convince the United Nations to intervene in the conflict between North and South Korea.
7 0
3 years ago
What role
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

no it will not

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why were Loyalists willing to support continued British rule but Patriots were not?
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

Patriots argued that citizens must give up freedoms to ensure security, but Loyalists disagreed.

Explanation:

I just did this and it was right but from my understanding patriots didn't want nobody to have freedom instead give up their freedom for security but the loyalists wanted everybody to have freedom and everybody to live how they want.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain how the U.S. supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona has impacted society?
    9·1 answer
  • What message might these frequent and violent changes in leadership have sent to people of the Roman Empire?
    15·1 answer
  • Help me answer this please
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think “bleeding kansas” produced intense controversy between many americans?
    8·1 answer
  • Which word most accurately describes public
    13·2 answers
  • How did Doris Lessing contribute to society?
    12·1 answer
  • On whose alphabet did the greeks base their own alphabet on
    14·1 answer
  • To obtain political rights, plebeians formed their own assembly called:
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to the chiefs after the red river war ?
    13·1 answer
  • Briefly explain ONE effect of New Deal legislation on the role of the federal government in the United States economy.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!