Based on the question above, Dickens did not consider the second man as a good listener.
<h3>Synopsis</h3>
From the text, he has clearly defined a good listener.
<h3 /><h3>
Good listener</h3>
- Knowing what to listen to, the good listener also knows what not to listen to; knowing the time to listen, he also knows the time to talk. When he feels that this time has come, it is clear that he must make a better talk.
<h3>Good talker</h3>
- I also agree with Dickens on who a good talker or listener should be. A good talker knows the maxims of communication and so does a listener.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answer is No. He would not consider him to be a good listener.
Learn more about Dickens here: brainly.com/question/25874822"
Answer:
Use emotional appeals to supplement your evidence and reasoning
Explanation:
From Chapter 17 of the textbook, <em>Persuade Reasoning Credibility, Evidence</em>, it is advised that emotional appeals in persuasive speeches should be used ethically to supplement evidence and reasoning.
Emotional appeal is a logical fallacy in which a person tries to win an argument by getting his opponent to reply emotionally.
Answer:
I feel like it's B
Explanation:
if you constantly change the way you act, at some point someones gonna like you, but then when you change it up it's harder to maintain a relationship
Just imagine, being crammed into a small, crowded area in silence for two years
