The Austrians and the Prussians were attacking along the french border and they were counterrevolutionary rebellions breaking out inside France
There were smarter, more qualified people working for the government which lead to a stable government.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "b. whether its intent has been compromised."
Re argument was largely devoted to the circumstances surrounding the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. The Supreme Court studies the Fourteenth Amendment to determine b. whether its intent has been compromised.
Explanation:
Since the 14th Amendment approach citizenship rights and fair protection under the law, it would be reserved for blacks in the late 1800s. The 14th Amendment was submitted in response to issues reported to former slaves during the Civil War. I would have to say that the Supreme Court studies the 14th Amendment to limit which Human Rights Acts to pass and which do not pass, an example could be abortion. Another time the Supreme Court would have to use the 14th Amendment to create something is if a person was not getting managed equally since the 14th Amendment states equal rights and equal power under the law.
A state court can handle civil or criminal. Mainly criminal. But it won’t handle a constitutional case because that’s the duty of the federal and Supreme Court
