This question is a bit tricky to answer because it does not state how often interest rate is applied so lets say for the simple 5% interest rate the rate of interest was calculated after 2 years you would pay a total interest of $15 since interest was only calculated once but for the 3% calculating every year with compound it would be a total of 18.27 dollars in interest but then you would have to calculate the 5% simple interest the same way which would total to $30 if calculated once a year being more than the 3% compound. But lets say interest is calculated once a month your total for the 5% simple interest would be $360 dollars interest for those 2 years and the 3% compound would be $406.97 dollars in interest. So over all the less amount of times interest compounds the less interest there is making it more worth than the simple but if the compounding occurs more frequently the simple 5% interest is more worth it. In this situation I think it might just be yearly interest which makes the 3% compound more worth taking for this short amount of time.
Demand and marginal revenue curves are downward-sloping for monopolistically competition firms because: a. product differentiation allows each firm some degree of monopoly power.
<h3>What is product differentiation?</h3>
Product differentiation can be defined as what makes a product to different from another product which is why some producer tend to include a unique features in their so as to make their product distinct from that of others.
A monopolistic competitive firms can tend to face a downward - sloping demand curve based on the fact that it help to differentiate their product from that of others competitors.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Product differentiation here: brainly.com/question/8107956
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Demand and marginal revenue curves are downward-sloping for monopolistically competition firms because...
a)product differentiation allows each firm some degree of monopoly power
b)there are a few large firms in the industry and they each act as a monopolist
c)mutual interdependence among all firms in the industry leads to collusion
d)each firm has to take the market price as given
Answer:
Theory X.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Groovy Rags, a trendy retail store, manager Eon Forcer doesn't waste any time thinking about whether the employees on his shift get their breaks at a reasonable time. In fact, he claims he is hard pressed to determine which one has "worked hard enough" to even deserve a break. Earlier today, Eon remarked, "I've never met one that likes this job! They're only biding their time and here for the money." Eon's managerial style would be classified as Theory X.
Douglas McGregor developed the theory x and y in the 1950s while working at the MIT Sloan school of management.
Theory X suggests that employees working in a particular organization dislike work, possess minimal ambition, and are generally not willing to take up responsibility.
Hence, with the Theory X it is very important and essential that these employees be supervised and rewarded externally with prizes and punishment should be used when they err.
The answer is psychological contract.
A broken psychological contract may occur when an employee believes that working extra would be naturally rewarded. This, however, may not be business policy. If the person is salaried, they may not be compensated for the extra hours worked.
Daily acts and remarks made in the workplace, as well as how they are interpreted by all parties involved, have an impact on the contract.
`
In other words, it is a promise developed via regular workplace encounters in which the organization learns what is expected of each employee.
Psychological contracts evolve and adapt to the organizational working culture over time. However, they are generally difficult to change and can differ across individual party members and whole organizations.
To know more about employer and employee relationship click here:
brainly.com/question/13400621
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. Married filling jointly
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about taxpayer's spouse who dies in August of the current year. In this case,
the taxpayer's filing status for the current year would be Married filling jointly. Joint return can be regarded as tax return which is been filed with the Internal Revenue Service by two married taxpayers that decide to have a filing status of "married filing jointly" or a widowed taxpayer that decide to have a filing status of " Qualifying Widow "A joint return give room for the
taxpayers to join their tax liability as well as report their income, credits and
deductions on the same joint return.
The joint return rates still validly
apply even two year after the death of a particular spouse, so far the
surviving spouse of the dead spouse does not remarry and still maintains a household as regards a dependent child.
