Ms Mallard's character is constructed through the detailed internal thoughts looking through the window. Her moment of epiphany, sudden revelation, helps her grasp a life of freedom and feel it. Some guilty might cross her mind, however, considering that the role women played in the time the story is set was not trascendent, it is such a great opportunity for a woman to be a widow and have a property.
The thief was caught, but his "accomplice" escaped.
1- Marcus' conflict is related to his friends; he wants to help them but he cannot. First, his friend Darryl has been stabbed and he cannot help him because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stops him. Darryl gets lost. The DHS takes Marcus and his friends prisoners and torture them. Marcus can hear his friends' cries but cannot help them.
2-Marcus is facing a conflict with the authority. The authority is authoritarian so he cannot do much. He has to obey them. He is physically attacked so he feels cornered. Although he has tried to explain to them his situation, the DHS ignores and tortures him.
3- Marcus ' current stage of identity is <em>foreclosure</em> since he is obliged to do what the DHS tells him to do. He accepts not to rebel against them. He wants to be free and he wants his friends to be free,too. During this identity stage, teenagers tend to follow what the adults say. Adults sometimes pressure teenagers to accept the roles they want for them.
4- Marcus will rebel against the DHS. He will notice that the DHS is not helping American society against terrorism. He believes they are not reliable ,so he will set an organization to fight against them. Probably, he will show he is more reliable than the DHS to protect America against terrorism.
5-Once at a party , I saw my best friend's fiancé cheating on her. I did not know what to do. My friend was madly in love with him. Finally ,I decided not to tell her anything. I learnt that they had to find a solution without my help.
Answer:
Explanation:
Freedom of expression is one of the major liberty afforded to citizens and residents of a nation being controlled by democratic rule. The freedom of expression allows citizens to air their concerns, make suggestions, and even make criticism about some government decisions which may seem overboard or unmeaningful to them without fear or apprehension of being trailed or punished on the basis of their utterances. These freedom of expression has however being taken overboard by some individuals, prompting the restrictions and regulations to these abused freedom afforded to citizens. It has been ovaervwd that some individuals are both careless and reckless with what they spew by saying and making declarations which are derogatory and defamatory against other individuals, religion, and tribes which are capable of inciting violence and undermining national security.
