Answer:
It means that being friendly towards oppressors will not have you get your rights. You cannot sit and wait for people to give you or others equal rights. The only proper way to get them to stop is by force, to hit them where it hurts. You could add the protests/BLM movement in as an example, the fact that policemen who kill innocent Black men and women typically walk free or get a slap on the wrist unless people demand justice.
The quote was made by civil rights activist Thurgood Marshall, the first Black man who served at the Supreme Court.
Civil rights were initially contained in the <u>first</u> part of the US Constitution - the Civil Rights Acts which was ratified in the 14th Amendment (1868).
<h3>What are Civil rights?</h3>
Civil rights are rights that protect the liberty of individuals from being infringed by others, governments, and social organizations.
They include the right to vote, the right to a fair trial, the right to public education, the right to gainful employment, the right to use public facilities, freedom of religion, etc.
The Civil Rights Act (1866) was the first United States federal law to explain what citizenship is. It also declared that all citizens are equally protected by the law.
The main purpose of the act was to protect the civil rights of African descent born in or brought to the United States.
Thus, the first part of our Constitution, which is the Civil Rights Act originally contains the civil rights of citizens.
Learn more about civil rights at brainly.com/question/13764349.
#SPJ1
Answer:
They earned money from colonization, so it mainly became a battle of how rich they were. And then the exploration part pretty much meant that they could claim 'new' land (that was already pretty much discovered by Native Americans) and make even more money, along with having power in the New World.
Explanation:
Answer:
freedom of the press.
Explanation:
If that is what you meant
Freedom of the press:Freedom of the press or freedom of the media is the principle that communication and expression through various media, including printed and electronic media, especially published materials, should be considered a right to be exercised freely. Such freedom implies the absence of interference from an overreaching state; its preservation may be sought through constitution or other legal protection and security.
Without respect to governmental information, any government may distinguish which materials are public or protected from disclosure to the public. State materials are protected due to either one of two reasons: the classification of information as sensitive, classified or secret, or the relevance of the information to protecting the national interest. Many governments are also subject to "sunshine laws" or freedom of information legislation that are used to define the ambit of national interest and enable citizens to request access to government-held information.
The United Nations' 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers".[1]
This philosophy is usually accompanied by legislation ensuring various degrees of the freedom of the scientific research (known as the scientific freedom), the publishing, and the press. The depth to which these laws are entrenched in a country's legal system can go as far down as its constitution. The concept of freedom of speech is often covered by the same laws as freedom of the press, thereby giving equal treatment to spoken and published expression. Sweden was the first country in the world to adopt freedom of the press into its constitution with the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766.
