Answer:
The answer is below brother or sista U_U
Explanation:
Right now, here in the present. All kids or teens ever do is play video games, or take pictures of themselves. While... there is a trend of adults playing with kid stuff. The reason why Adults play with kid stuff is because it brings back the memories from the time they used to play with toys. My dad's interest was playing marbles and was one of the best marble players in the whole school and most of the kids would bring their marbles and shoot it around the playground and it was a big trend at my dad's school. Last time I caught (an old realitive you know) playing with an old slinky and I asked (is it a she or he?) why is (she or he) playing that old slinky instead of being on (his or her) phone instead and quit playing with a kids toy. (Realitive u know) sat me down and told me that just because an adult plays with a kids toy doesn't mean its immature... Its because.. it brings back the old memories from the time period I was in and who knows it might be a hobby for us adults. On Ytube I saw these people bringing out the old toys from back then and they remember it and started to play it and told the viewers that it bring back memories from the time they were in. Its not Immature if an adult was playing with a kids toy its just to bring back memories or maybe their hobby like reading comic books or play tea party or play with dolls.
Answer:
third person
i know this because i looked it up on Google
I'm pretty sure it's third person omniscient
In the excerpt from Thunberg's speech, she moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions, as explained below.
<h3>What is Thunberg's reasoning?</h3>
This question concerns the ending of the speech given by Greta Thunberg at the United Nations. Thunberg mentions the following:
- We can still have a 67% chance to stay below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise.
- To accomplish that, back in 2018, we had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit.
- However, that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
- In conclusion, our CO2 budget will be over in just 8 and a half years.
We can see that Thunberg goes from a general premise to a specific prediction about emissions. The premise consists of everything she says about the amount of CO2 we are allowed to emit. The prediction is that we will use up that amount in just 8 years.
With the information above in mind, we can select option B as the correct answer concerning Thunberg's reasoning. She moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions.
The missing excerpt is the following:
"To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
"How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years."
Learn more about Greta Thunberg here:
brainly.com/question/28419470
#SPJ1
