Considering the situation described above, when Global Petroleum negotiated a deal with Saudi Arabia, this is an example of <u>Bartering</u>.
<h3>What is a Bartering?</h3>
Bartering is a transaction agreement whereby both parties agree to pay with goods or services without using money.
Therefore, in this situation, when Global Petroleum negotiated with Saudi Arabia to receive oil as partial payment over 20 years. This is an example of <u>Bartering</u>.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Bartering</u>.
Learn more about <u>Bartering</u> here: brainly.com/question/1462751
Answer:
(a)
Dr Investment in Gordon Corp. 230,400
Cr Cash 230,400
( to record investment in Gordon Corp.; calculated as 10 x 23,000 + 400)
(b)
Dr Investment in Gordon Corp. 18,400
Cr Share of Gordon Corp earning 18,400
( to record share of profit in Gordon Corp, calculated as % of Gordon Corp share owned x Gordon Corp's earnings = 23,000/100,000 x 80,000)
(c)
Dr Cash 45,000
Cr Investment in Gordon Corp. 45,000
( Record dividend receipt from Gordon Corp)
Explanation:
Further explanation, as Morgan Co. acquires 23% of Gordon Corp. ( 23,000/100,000); equity method should be applied.
A board of directors<span> is elected by the stockholders of a corporation to oversee its general operation and set long-term objectives. A board of directors can serve for a for-profit business, non-profit business, or on a government agency. The board of directors are voted in and recognized as important decision makers. </span>
The correct answer is Only (A) and (C) are true
Explanation:
In a study or research, the control group is the one that does not receive a treatment. This means, in this case, the control group includes those who only drink the green tea without the herbs because they serve as a standard to measure the effects of the herbs. This makes statement A (The "only green tea" group serves as the control group) true; also, the group receiving the herbs is the experimental group.
On the other hand, a double-blind study is one in which the researchers and the participants ignore who is receiving the treatment, which guarantees there is objectivity. This occurs in the study presented because neither the researcher nor the subjects known who received the herbal mix. Thus, statement C (This study is double-blind) is true.
Finally, a study is classified as observational if there is not intervention but the researchers just observe participants to study a phenomenon. This does not occur in the study presented because there is an intervention through the herbal treatment, and therefore the study is not observational.
