It was the best of times and the worst of times. They hated but they loved. She would pick on him and he’d retaliate. With a school project coming up, it made matters worse because they desperately but secretly wanted to work together. They got to crazy with eachother that they were forced together. So happy they were to work together and fall in love.
Overall, Thoreau wanted to prove that not everyone will easily flow with the rules of society. As a result, he calls the people who go different paths than the ones of society "different drummers."
In conclusion, your final answer should be A.
Indicates a state of questioning.
Interrogative verbs are "why" and "when" and other question words.
Both authors of "In Flanders Fields" and "Dulce et Decorum Est!" chose the same historical event as the setting but these books shows the World War 1 from two absolutely different points of view. "In Flanders Fields" author praises and blesses all those warriors who protected their native land fighted for it and its future generations. While reading this story you feel persuasive tone that aimed to make you feel the same. "Dulce et Decorum Est!" shows the most appalling things that happened during the War and urges us that if we had ever been through It all it would have been the worst nightmare in our life. To conclude : in the first story author eulogizes War whereas the second warns against it.
