Answer:Cause and Effect Analysis
Explanation:
The cause and Effect Analysis is a technique that helps you identify all the likely causes of a problem. This means that you can find and fix the main cause, first time around, without the problem running on and on.
The diagrams you create with this type of analysis are sometimes known as fishbone diagrams, because they look like the skeleton of a fish. The technique was developed by Professor Ishikawa in the 1960s.
To solve a problem with this technique, write down your problem in a box on the left-hand side of a piece of paper. Then draw a straight line from the box to the other side of the paper.
Once you've written down the problem, draw several lines that extend out from your long horizontal line. You're now going to brainstorm all of the factors that could be contributing to this problem. These may be systems, equipment, materials, external forces, people involved with the problem, and so on.
Answer:
- A. Working capital will remain the same at $18,964,118
- C. Chesters' long-term debt will rise by $9,000,000
- E. Total liabilities will be $139,957,573
Explanation:
You included no balance sheet for Chester so I will answer based on inference.
Option A is most likely correct because Working capital relates to Current Assets less Current liabilities so Plant and Equipment (fixed assets) and bonds (long term liabilities) will not affect it.
Total assets rising to $235,525,291 is also quite possible if the assets were previously $225,525,291 so just check for that but this is most likely correct.
Option C is wrong because the long term debt should rise by $10,000,000 which is the value of the bonds.
Option D is wrong as well as this relates to long term bonds not investment by shareholders.
Total liabilties rising is probably correct if the current figure on the balance sheet is $129,957,573 because that would mean that it increased by $10,000,000 which is the price of the bond.
So just check your given balance sheet for Options C and E for my notes and if correct, they are your answers as well as A.
Answer:
Production for 2nd Quarter = 15,000 units
Explanation:
given data
ending inventory of finished goods = 25 %
finished goods inventory at year start = 4,000 units
so we consider here Quarter sales in unit
1 = 12,000
2 = 14,000
3 = 18,000
4 = 16,000
solution
we get here Production for 2nd Quarter that is
Production for 2nd Quarter = Quarter 2 sale + Desired Q2 ending inventory - Beginning Q2 inventory ...................1
so it will be as
Production for 2nd Quarter = Quarter 2 sale + (25% of Q3 Sale) - (25% of Q2 sale)
put here value
Production for 2nd Quarter = 14000 + (18000 × 25%) - (14000 × 25%)
Production for 2nd Quarter = 14000 + 4500 - 3500
Production for 2nd Quarter = 15,000 units
Answer:
$22,050
Explanation:
The computation of the net account receivable after the adjustment of bad debt is shown below:
As we know that
Net account receivable = Account receivable - bad debt expense
= $25,000 - $2,950
= $22,050
By deducting the bad debt expense from the account receivable we can get the net account receivable and the same is to be considered
hence, the correct option is B.