1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lapo4ka [179]
3 years ago
9

I need Help ASAP

History
1 answer:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
8 0
A is the answer pls make brainless
You might be interested in
Who was commander of the American troops at Saratoga?
Elena-2011 [213]
General sir william howe

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
miss Akunina [59]

When Europeans first touched the shores of the Americas, Old World crops such as wheat, barley, rice, and turnips had not traveled west across the Atlantic, and New World crops such as maize, white potatoes, sweet potatoes, and manioc had not traveled east to Europe. In the Americas, there were no horses, cattle, sheep, or goats, all animals of Old World origin. Except for the llama, alpaca, dog, a few fowl, and guinea pig, the New World had no equivalents to the domesticated animals associated with the Old World, nor did it have the pathogens associated with the Old World’s dense populations of humans and such associated creatures as chickens, cattle, black rats, and Aedes egypti mosquitoes. Among these germs were those that carried smallpox, measles, chickenpox, influenza, malaria, and yellow fever.

The Columbian exchange of crops affected both the Old World and the New. Amerindian crops that have crossed oceans—for example, maize to China and the white potato to Ireland—have been stimulants to population growth in the Old World. The latter’s crops and livestock have had much the same effect in the Americas—for example, wheat in Kansas and the Pampa, and beef cattle in Texas and Brazil. The full story of the exchange is many volumes long, so for the sake of brevity and clarity let us focus on a specific region, the eastern third of the United States of America.

As might be expected, the Europeans who settled on the east coast of the United States cultivated crops like wheat and apples, which they had brought with them. European weeds, which the colonists did not cultivate and, in fact, preferred to uproot, also fared well in the New World. John Josselyn, an Englishman and amateur naturalist who visited New England twice in the seventeenth century, left us a list, “Of Such Plants as Have Sprung Up since the English Planted and Kept Cattle in New England,” which included couch grass, dandelion, shepherd’s purse, groundsel, sow thistle, and chickweeds. One of these, a plantain (Plantago major), was named “Englishman’s Foot” by the Amerindians of New England and Virginia who believed that it would grow only where the English “have trodden, and was never known before the English came into this country.” Thus, as they intentionally sowed Old World crop seeds, the European settlers were unintentionally contaminating American fields with weed seed. More importantly, they were stripping and burning forests, exposing the native minor flora to direct sunlight and to the hooves and teeth of Old World livestock. The native flora could not tolerate the stress. The imported weeds could, because they had lived with large numbers of grazing animals for thousands of years.

Cattle and horses were brought ashore in the early 1600s and found hospitable climate and terrain in North America. Horses arrived in Virginia as early as 1620 and in Massachusetts in 1629. Many wandered free with little more evidence of their connection to humanity than collars with a hook at the bottom to catch on fences as they tried to leap over them to get at crops. Fences were not for keeping livestock in, but for keeping livestock out.


5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I WILL GIVE BRAINIEST
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

That's nice, but there's no question to answer?

Explanation:

If you edit and post the question, I'd be happy to try and answer it

3 0
1 year ago
Which calculation helps determine which producer has the absolute advantage?
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:

The calculation that helps to determine which producer has the absolute advantage is:

B. The amount produced divided by resources used

Explanation

Productivity is calculated by dividing the amount of output produced by the inputs used in its production process. The size of the output is divided by the resources used to produce the goods to determine the advantage/profit acquired in a business process.This will give the producers ultimate advantage as compared to number of time the business will pay back.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which Supreme Court procedure involves justices hearing oral arguments and expert testimony by both parties in a case
Aneli [31]
Public Arguments is the answer
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following items could serve as a primary source for a historian studying the American Civil War? A. A journal writt
    13·1 answer
  • What were some differences between the virginia colony and the plymouth colony?
    8·1 answer
  • Which was a greater motivation for European imperialism in the late 1800s?
    11·1 answer
  • Por que as eleições presidenciais de 1910 provocaram, no ano seguinte, a revolução mexicana?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Freedmen's Bureau?
    7·1 answer
  • The land east of the Appalachian mountains belonged to what country?
    6·1 answer
  • What does the enemy have (hessians) that the Continental Army need?
    11·2 answers
  • Indian Removal Quiz Active 1 2 3 5 6 o n Which best describes President Andrew Jackson's American Indian policy? President Jacks
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me hurry plz
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best completes the analogy? Caesar : People :: Pompey: _______
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!